College/Bathurst development undermines a lively corner
By Luca Tatulli
On January 20, Councillor Mike Layton (Ward 11, University-Rosedale) hosted a tumultuous online consultation for the proposed development at the corner of College and Bathurst streets. While the development has received significant press due to the fact that it will involve the destruction of the building that now houses Sneaky Dee’s, residents at the meeting seemed more concerned about how the new development will change the demographics of the neighbourhood.
“This is valuable time and energy taken away from those with desperate needs,” said Kile Mugwat, a resident of the area. “This is not needed, this is not necessary.”
He added that he opposes the development due to its failure to prioritize the needs of low-income Annex residents, and cited the anonymity of the developer as another point of concern.
“I think any development that isn’t introduced to address community needs specifically shouldn’t go ahead,” said Mugwat indicating his further opposition to the development. “Right now, it should be only about creating housing for the people who need it.”
The applicant for the development is currently unknown and has not come forward. Representatives from the Goldberg Group, the site planners for the project, were present during the meeting on their behalf. The practice of developers’ agents attending consultations in their place is not uncommon.
The Goldberg Group has indicated that the developer would work with the community and has uploaded the project’s 3D modelling and architectural plans to the City of Toronto website.
The proposed development at 431 College St. has been the home of Sneaky Dee’s since 1990. The restaurant has hosted a wide variety of Canadian punk rock and alternative bands. The strip is also home to restaurants Onnki Donburi and Queztal along with RBC Royal Bank. The proposed development would replace the current College and Bathurst strip. It would see a 13-storey multi-purpose building replace the current plaza. The development would have 169 units in total and it would share three ground-level retail spaces. Residential units would be located above the proposed retail units. The proposed development will provide just over 13,009 square metres of living space.
“There’s a real feeling that the city doesn’t care about what we, as residents of this community, want,” said artist Lex Corbett in an interview with the Gleaner following the meeting. “There’s a huge amount of frustration with the idea that people with a lot of money can come in and alter the landscape with little input from the people who live here. I don’t want this development but the developer isn’t doing anything that hasn’t been done countless times across the city. There’s certainly no element of coercion. It is simply people with a lot of money doing what they do: investing in real estate to the detriment of the community.”
Corbett is also the founder of the Stop the Sneaky Dee’s/College Bathurst Development Facebook group. The group is active in opposing the development by attending community consultations and sharing up-to-date information about the development. The group itself does not push for any specific policies, serving instead as a community platform.
Councillor Mike Layton is opposed to the overall development, but says that it is necessary to negotiate with developers to secure affordable housing for residents. Developers currently do not have to commit to building affordable housing and the city does not have the power to mandate affordable housing in new developments.
“If we don’t engage with the developer they will simply appeal and we know from experience, we won’t get as good a result,” said Layton “We cannot legally secure affordable housing without the developer’s agreement.”
A policy framework for the application of inclusionary zoning (IZ) was drafted for the city in September.
The existing provincial rule allows municipalities to obtain affordable housing in new development projects but the lands in question have to be at least within a 500-800 metre radius of a transit stop or station. In Toronto, proposed IZ rules would apply to qualifying areas that have moderate to strong markets for housing. A minimum of 5% of total rental units in these areas would be set aside for affordable housing.
The official plan application for the project was submitted to the city on Sept. 23. The application itself is currently under review with a city council decision on the project pending.
READ MORE ON LOCAL DEVELOPMENTS:
- DEVELOPINGS: Developments at your doorstep (Jan. 2021)
- NEWS: Estonian Centre gets green light (Jan. 2021)
- NEWS: Seven storeys proposed for Davenport/Dupont (Dec. 2020)
- NEWS: Neighbours oppose demolition plans (Nov. 2020)
- FORUM: Inclusionary zoning is the answer (Oct. 2020)
- NEWS: Residents reject plans for Planetarium site (Aug. 2020)
- ON THE COVER: Halfway there (May 2020)
- NEWS: Affordable housing brought to Bathurst (Feb. 2020)
- DEVELOPINGS: Annex area developments loom (Jan. 2020)
- NEWS: New tower for Bloor and Spadina (Jan. 2020)
- NEWS: Plans for a “slender” building (August 2019)
- NEWS: Cities trump space (May 2019)
- NEWS: Condo plan evolves (Winter 2019)
- FOCUS: Davenport development goes to mediation (Spring 2018)
- NEWS: Height-ened fears (Dec. 2017)
- NEWS: First look at Bloor Street United (Oct. 2017)
- CHATTER: Coming down (Nov. 2017)
- EDITORIAL: Westbank’s positive precedent (April 2017)
- NEWS: U of T seeks to expand planning exemption (APRIL 2017)
- NEWS: Westbank presents latest proposal (MARCH 2017)
- FORUM: Build a neighbourhood (March 2017)
- NEWS: New chapter for student residence? (February 2017)
- NEWS: Preventing a wall of towers (October 2016)
- NEWS: Height, density still top concerns (July 2016)
- NEWS: Westbank submits revised application (June 2016)
- NEWS: Tall tower before OMB, as city battles back with block study (August 2016)
- NEWS: Planning for the future (May 2016)
- Westbank towers over 4 Corners (January 2016)
- City hosts first Mirvish Village community consultation (November 2015)
- Residents’ associations share concerns for Mirvish Village (October 2015)
- Westbank submits application (August 2015)
- NEWS: BABIA endorses Westbank proposal (July 2015)
- NEWS: How do you make it real? (April 2015)
- DEVELOPINGS: Annual review reflects tension between community activism and OMB (March 2016)
- NEWS: Dupont decision sets precedent (March 2018)
- NEWS: New vision for Bloor Street United (JULY 2017)
- NEWS: U of T, community in talks over Bloor United project (June 2012)