The Royal Ontario of Museum (ROM) has been providing free access to the Daphne Cockwell Gallery dedicated to First Peoples art & culture since April 18. It’s all part of an initiative to educate Canadians on Indigenous culture and welcome more people to the museum.

Located on the main floor of the Hillary and Galen Weston Wing, the gallery has more than one thousand pieces by Indigenous artists, and has been one of the museum’s most important cultural spaces since opening in 2005. The museum has an Indigenous Advisory Circle, and an Indigenous Knowledge Resource Teacher is available Monday to Friday from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.

The gallery is named for Daphne Cockwell, a nurse in the Second World War. Her son, Jack, is a dedicated ROM supporter and received its Distinguished Service Award in 2012.

—Billie Wilner/Gleaner News

Seaton Village resident Charles Spearin of Broken Social Scene performs at Open Tuning’s 2015 festival, which returns June 9. GLEANER FILE PHOTO/COURTESY NEIL MUSCOTT

Musicians of all genres, ages, and levels are set to perform from garages, porches, storefronts, and restaurants when the Open Tuning Festival returns to Seaton Village from noon to 9 p.m. on June 9. Founded in 2014 by a group of local residents, the free music festival will feature over 100 performers and 20 venues.

Billed as a listening experience, Open Tuning encourages audience members to roam from stage to stage (or porch to porch as it were), taking in the music from all corners of Seaton Village, a historical neighbourhood bordered by Bloor, Dupont, Bathurst, and Christie streets.

Run entirely by volunteers, the festival is open to performers of all ages and skill levels. For more information on the festival, please visit opentuningfestival.wordpress.com.

—Billie Wilner/Gleaner News

READ MORE:

ARTS: Connecting neighbours through music (May 2016)

U of T study shows that anxiety can be productive

Researchers from the University of Toronto have recently published a study demonstrating that some workplace anxiety motivates employees to be more productive and focused on a task. COURTESY SHUTTERSHOCK

By Ahmed-Zaki Hagar

About 500,000 Canadians are unable to work during a given week due to a mental illness, according to a 2008 study by the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. And, according to the Mental Health Commission of Canada, mental illness affects seven out of ten Canadians in the workplace, with anxiety being the most common symptom.

However, a recent University of Toronto (U of T) study has found that workplace anxiety can be beneficial for workers.

Bonnie Cheng, an assistant professor at Hong Kong Polytechnic University and U of T graduate, and Julie McCarthy, a U of T professor, say that their findings show how moderate levels of anxiety can motivate people.

[pullquote]“It just does not make sense that everyone is having a bad performance. You see people who are anxious who just get their stuff together and perform quite well”—Bonnie Cheng, assistant professor, Hong Kong Polytechnic University[/pullquote]

Cheng says that she was interested in the growing public discussion on mental health and her study aims to show that anxiety “is something we do not have to run away from”.

“If we only accept that anxiety is bad for us, what are the implications of that, if you think about the workplace from so many people being anxious?” she says. “It just does not make sense that everyone is having a bad performance. You see people who are anxious who just get their stuff together and perform quite well.”

Going through past research on the subject, Cheng and McCarthy say that there are three facts that can impact a worker’s performance: motivation, ability, and emotional intelligence.

Cheng says that these factors can either aid with anxiety or “turn it into a fear and [let it] debilitate you”.

“Having some level of anxiety is good because that can stimulate you to put out your best work,” she says. “It is really about embracing that anxiety so that you can use it to facilitate your performance.”

Cheng and McCarthy break down workplace anxiety into two categories.

Dispositional workplace anxiety is based on a person’s traits, like their general level of anxiety. Situational workplace anxiety is how a person feels anxious in certain situations, such as from a job interview or a deadline.

Cheng explained how employees who have to provide a “service with a smile”, at times when they are not happy, have to suppress their anxiety.

The article says that jobs with high emotional labour demands coupled with high customer turnover could lead to heightened anxiety. Other characteristics that can trigger anxiety include office politics, high expectations, and tight deadlines.

Cheng says that these two types of anxiety are “tightly linked”, but can impact performance differently.

“For trait-levels of anxiety, you can think of it as something that is chronic. Over time, it can hurt your performance because it will exhaust you,” she says. “For situational levels of anxiety, because it is more short-term, it can hurt your performance because, in those situations, it will distract you.

“The facilitative side of anxiety for both of them is very similar, they both centre around self-regulation.”

Cheng says that organizations and employers can help their employees with managing their anxiety. She points to Google’s efforts to train managers with helping their employees with their emotional intelligence as an example to follow.

“Organizations can help to invest in employees in terms of offering the right training and giving them the right tools so that employees can feel that they have the necessary resources to perform their tasks,” she says.

More how nice!

EDITORIAL CARTOON: How Nice (May 2018)

EDITORIAL CARTOON: How Nice (Spring 2018)

EDITORIAL CARTOON: How Nice (Mar. 2018)

EDITORIAL CARTOON: How Nice (Dec. 2017)

EDITORIAL CARTOON How nice! (August 2017)

EDITORIAL CARTOON How nice! (July 2017)

EDITORIAL CARTOON: how nice! by blamb (June 2017)

EDITORIAL CARTOON: TCHC (May 2017)

EDITORIAL CARTOON: The Grand Tory (April 2017)

FORUM: Celebrating 20 years of cartoonist Brett Lamb (April 2017)

EDITORIAL CARTOON: A second chance! by Brett Lamb 2037 (February 2017)

EDITORIAL CARTOON: Not really! It’s actually nice! by Stumpy the Subway(January 2017)

What’s lost in the provincial debate over whether minimum wage should be $14 or $15 an hour is an accompanying discussion of what full-time employment at minimum wage actually pays for. It’s a glaring omission when you consider that many people spent the biggest portion of their money on a place to call home.

The cost to keep a roof over one’s head is eating more and more of one’s paycheque, and a buck or two more an hour won’t make much of a difference. The increasingly stark juxtaposition of the cost of renting a dwelling and average wages is worth examining, particularly because all four provincial parties are promising the voting public the world.

The lack of affordable housing is a growing problem across the province, but even more so in Toronto. Given how much renters pay each month relative to their incomes, they cannot endure a single hiccup in their income stream or they will be out on the street. The Advocacy Centre for Tenants Ontario (ACTO) recently released Where Will We Live? Ontario’s Affordable Renting Housing Crisis, which demonstrates that 46.9 per cent of Toronto’s renter households are spending 30 per cent or more of their income on rental costs. That means a tenant would have to earn at least $24 per hour to afford the average rent in the Greater Toronto Area.

(The 30 per cent margin of income is a widely-used benchmark to determine if rent is in fact affordable. It also provides a window into whether or not there will be enough left over for a decent quality of life after the rent gets paid.)

According to the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), a one-bedroom condominium goes for $1,800 and a one-bedroom apartment for $1,200. But these averages reflect existing rents in occupied dwellings instead of what is on the market, given a landlord’s ability to spike the rent once they have a vacancy, and do not reflect local rates in places like the Annex, which is a whole other kettle of fish.

According to ACTO, a renter here would need to earn $30 per hour in order to afford rent. At $14 an hour, one would to have to log 86 hours a week, which is equivalent to over two full-time jobs!

The federal government has committed $40 billion to a national housing strategy aimed at lifting 530,000 families out of unaffordable or substandard housing. Where is the province on this? The province needs a matching program — adding another dollar or two to minimum wage will not solve the problem.

Westbank Projects Corp.’s redevelopment of the former Honest Ed’s site is a local example of a developer identifying and filling a need for more rental units. They even made 10 per cent of the 850 units affordable, and included one, two, and three bedroom units in the affordable mix. But this will hardly meet all the rental needs in Toronto, where the vacancy rate for one bedroom apartments is about one per cent.

The peace of mind afforded by having a roof over one’s head is incalculable. When provincial candidates come knocking at your door, perhaps you’ll consider asking them what they plan to do about it.

READ MORE ON THE ELECTION:

NEWS: Grilling potential MPPs (Election Special 2018)

GREENINGS: Choosing the lesser evil (Election Special 2018)

FORUM: Bold new initiatives for Ontario (Election Special 2018)

FORUM: Reducing downtown’s vehicles by 25 per cent (May 2018)

FORUM: What kind of Ontario do we want? (May 2018)

FORUM: What kind of province do we want? (March 2018)

READ MORE EDITORIALS: 

EDITORIAL: Lessons to be learned from Excessive Force (Spring 2018)

EDITORIAL: A social contract is a precious thing (March 2018)

EDITORIAL: Intolerance leading to Quebec’s decline (Dec. 2017)

EDITORIAL (Nov. 2017): Student safety suffers as trustees cave

EDITORIAL: Pandering to religious intolerance (October 2017)

EDITORIAL: Bike lanes, good for business (Fall 2017)

EDITORIAL: Don’t sacrifice safety for political gain (August 2017)

EDITORIAL: Thank you Mr. Asti (July 2017)

EDITORIAL: A watershed moment (June 2017)

EDITORIAL: Revoke U of T’s unchecked “licence to build” (May 2017)

EDITORIAL: Westbank’s positive precedent (April 2017)

EDITORIAL: Foreign buyers tax a necessary cliff jump (March 2017)

Making the case for the provincial Liberals

By Jo-Ann Davis

Elections have consequences. On June 7, voters in Ontario will make a choice that will have a profound impact on the welfare of students, seniors, families in our community, the economy, and environment.

Premier Wynne and the Liberal government are offering Ontarians bold new initiatives to grow an Ontario that’s fair, just, and offers new opportunities. One where human dignity is valued, climate change is combatted, a workforce is well educated, skilled, healthy and agile, and a business environment that is growing and innovating, while creating jobs and supporting workers’ rights.

A desire for change that lifts people out of poverty and improves our everyday lives is what brought Ontario a fair minimum wage, full-day kindergarten, expanded daycare, more skilled trades apprenticeships, free tuition for students from low income families, youth and senior pharmacare, expanded home care, a basic income pilot, a cap-and-trade system that reduces pollutants and raised $1.9 billion in 2017 to support green initiatives in our homes, schools, hospitals, and on our streets, and world-leading research and development.

Meanwhile, Doug Ford and his “Progressive” Conservatives (PC) would reverse change — abandoning the environment, taking away a fair minimum wage, axing rent controls, and a modern sex education curriculum, while threatening to cut billions. With no carbon tax, Mr. Ford needs to replace $4 billion — without any tax cuts — to make good on the PC platform. This means cuts to hospitals, schools, mental health, low income seniors, and supports for families trying to make ends meet.

At the same time the New Democratic Party platform is long on promises for additional funding for everything from health care to social housing, and education to public transit with no details on where the additional revenue will be found.

I support electoral reform, and therefore empathize with Green party supporters, and agree that new funding sustainable funding sources are needed for public transit, bike and pedestrian infrastructure.

University-Rosedale needs a strong, progressive representative at Queen’s Park — one that listens to local voices, works effectively with other levels of government, and has a proven track record of success. That why I’m running to be your Member of Provincial Parliament (MPP) for University-Rosedale.

I’ve spent much of my life studying, volunteering and living in and around University-Rosedale. It’s where I went to high school, and completed my undergraduate studies, as a University of Toronto student. It’s where my son plays soccer for SC Toronto, and my husband coaches.

It’s where Torontonians from all walks of life live, work, study, volunteer and play, with a diversity found in few other places. This is a riding knitted together by distinct neighbourhoods — welcoming to all. Neighbourhoods seeking a local voice in development, main streets with local businesses, diverse housing that’s affordable, daycare that’s accessible, and urban spaces where children and seniors have a place.

In 2010, I chose to run to be the local Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) trustee to advocate for vulnerable students and families, and shape a system built on public accountability, evidence and transparency.

As trustee for the last eight years, I’ve fought for students with special needs at budget time, focused staff resources on working to close the student learning opportunity gap between rich and poor, partnered with the City of Toronto to transform a pavement-covered playground into an urban garden and park at Markham and London streets opening this September, and championed making the TCDSB the first net zero energy school board in Ontario.

Professionally, I lead large-scale change for some of Canada’s biggest corporations. Bringing people with diverse perspectives together to achieve important change is a skill every politician should have — it’s what I’ve been doing for 15 years.

Knocking on thousands of doors, I’ve heard from people that they want an MPP who knows the community, who listens to and understands local issues, and who has the passion and skills to advocate for change at Queen’s Park. A proven community advocate with a track record of innovation is what I would bring as your MPP for University-Rosedale.

Jo-Ann Davis is the Ontario Liberal Candidate for University-Rosedale.

READ MORE BY OTHER CANDIDATES:

FORUM: The Green Party’s platform (Election Special 2018)

FORUM: Reducing downtown’s vehicles by 25 per cent (May 2018)

FORUM: What kind of Ontario do we want? (May 2018)

FORUM: What kind of province do we want? (March 2018)

READ MORE ON THE ELECTION:

EDITORIAL: The market has no moral compass (Election Special 2018)

NEWS: Grilling potential MPPs (Election Special 2018)

GREENINGS: Choosing the lesser evil (Election Special 2018)

Focus on innovative measures and renewable energy

By Tim Grant

I have lived all my life in our new riding of University-Rosedale. My involvement as a teenager in the fight against the Spadina Expressway propelled me into a lifetime focus on local and provincial issues. For the past 15 years, I have served on the board of the Harbord Village Residents’ Association, one of the most active residents’ associations in the city, chairing the organization for the last seven years.

In this election, we have a choice. We have two parties that will fund new programs by adding to our debt, one party that will cut social programs, and another option: the Green Party. Here are a few examples of how we Greens approach some of our current challenges.

[pullquote]Rather than taking on debt, let’s look for stable sustainable sources of new revenue to pay for the things we need.[/pullquote]

Capture new sources of revenue to help pay for the services we need. As I’ve previously written in the Gleaner, we supported Toronto City Council’s request for road tolls on the Gardiner Expressway and Don Valley Parkway. Had the province agreed, tolls would now provide $350 million annually to the Toronto Transit Commission. A $2 per day parking surcharge in commercial lots across the Greater Toronto Area would raise $2 billion a year for transit. If we increase royalties charged for the extraction of groundwater, gravel, and minerals, we can raise billions of dollars to pay for dental care and other new programs. Rather than taking on debt, let’s look for stable sustainable sources of new revenue to pay for the things we need.

Replace aging nuclear generators with clean green energy. Expensive nuclear refurbishments, perpetually over budget, are a major factor in hydro rate increases. The other three parties are willing to borrow now to lower electricity rates, leaving it to the next generation to pay for today’s wasteful consumption. We want hydro bills that don’t hide the real cost of electricity. If we replace nuclear with green energy, our electricity bills are going to be lower. We would close the 47-year-old Pickering Nuclear Generating Station and replace its power with safe low-cost hydro from Quebec, and renewable energy and conservation programs here in Ontario.

Fight poverty with innovative measures. Let’s implement a guaranteed annual income, which would remove the stigma experienced by those on social assistance and provide stability for everyone in a time when jobs are increasingly precarious. Let’s make sure that 20 per cent of all units in new condominiums are affordable. With rich and poor on the same elevator, we’ll have healthier communities. Finally, let’s copy European governments and focus on preventative health care. We would tax junk food to pay for school food programs — reducing child hunger — and ensure that those on social assistance receive a monthly $200 fruit-and-vegetable supplement.

Such measures will improve public health, and the savings in health care costs can be used to fund a wider array of health services.

Merge Catholic and public school boards. It is time to have kids of all faiths (and no faiths) growing up side by side.

Merging the boards would save $1 billion every year for use in reducing class sizes and repairing school buildings.

License local businesses to sell cannabis. With legalization around the corner, our goal should be to ensure public safety and capture revenue to fund health care and other programs.

Licensing only 40 Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO) outlets this year and 120 within two years (only nine in Toronto) is not going to eliminate the black market or raise significant revenue. Let’s learn from our experience of supporting craft breweries against the beer monopolies and license local businesses to supplement LCBO sales.

Making significant progress on any of these issues will require a Green Party voice in the legislature. For years, I have worked on long-term solutions to enhance our downtown communities. It would be an honour to continue that work as your MPP.

Tim Grant is the Green Party of Ontario candidate in University-Rosedale.

READ MORE BY OTHER CANDIDATES:

FORUM: Bold new initiatives for Ontario (Election Special 2018)

FORUM: Reducing downtown’s vehicles by 25 per cent (May 2018)

FORUM: What kind of Ontario do we want? (May 2018)

FORUM: What kind of province do we want? (March 2018)

READ MORE ON THE ELECTION:

NEWS: Grilling potential MPPs (Election Special 2018)

EDITORIAL: The market has no moral compass (Election Special 2018)

GREENINGS: Choosing the lesser evil (Election Special 2018)

Assessing the parties through an environmental lens

At the risk of sounding like a single-issue voter, it will be no surprise to anyone who has read any of my columns that the environment ranks high. There are lots of other issues, such as healthcare, debt, economic growth, but all that is moot as we stare mass extinction in the face. If you think I’m being hyperbolic, you aren’t paying attention. Before his death, Stephen Hawking gave humanity another two centuries before we’re toast. To me, the long-term survival of our species trumps any short-term issue we are facing at the moment, no matter how pressing it might seem.

[pullquote]The Liberals have come up with a number of good ideas in the environmental department, but execution leaves a lot to be desired.[/pullquote]

The Progressive Conservatives under Patrick Brown’s leadership actually had a promising platform. They acknowledged climate change and would have followed the federal carbon tax rules. That was at least a start. His actions however were not becoming of a premier, or anyone in a position of leadership.

Doug Ford has reversed his promise to open up the Greenbelt to development. It’s a good thing he’s abandoned these short-sighted and ridiculous plans — you don’t fix the housing crisis by creating a food crisis.

How much farmland do we reduce down to before we realize we can’t feed ourselves? The Greenbelt isn’t just uninhabited tundra, it’s some of the most fertile farmland in the world.

We don’t need more McMansions on top of productive land. We need higher density in areas we have already inhabited. We need to put homes where people don’t need to get in their fossil-fuel-powered boxes and expel carbon dioxide in order to get to work or buy a carton of milk.

The policy reversal was a good step, but refusal to take on carbon pricing tells me he’s stuck in a model of growth at all costs. Extinction is too high a cost.

The Liberals have come up with a number of good ideas in the environmental department, but execution leaves a lot to be desired. Carbon tax is great, cap and trade, meh. Better than nothing.

They have recycling fees that are so pathetically low it makes no sense, but at least it’s there on items like electronics. The environmental fee they tried years ago was a fantastic idea, but the execution was so bad it didn’t last.

I’m very happy about the renewable energy capacity increase in the province, less so about our management of it. While not entirely the Liberals’ fault, they should have known the underlying issues and started trying to deal with them. When it comes to transit, I will never forgive them for giving Rob Ford the hammer he needed to reopen Scarborough subway.

While it is easy to criticize those in power, I actually couldn’t tell you what the New Democratic Party platform is without looking it up.

Upon investigation, there was some poetic waxing about a better environment, renewable energy that will be integrated responsibly (I don’t know what that means), but the thing that really stood out to me was a 30 per cent reduction in hydro rates. WHAT? We want to make it cheaper to use electricity when so much of it still comes from fossil fuels? WHAT?

I thought only the Liberals were nonsensical enough for this. Few details exist on the NDP’s website for me to make any determination at this point, but perhaps things will become clear.

The Greens are the closest to my heart. They want to axe Catholic schools so we don’t have redundant buses on the same route, and they want to let the city toll the Gardiner and DVP. They want to collect carbon fees, phase out internal combustion engines, and give incentives for energy efficiency.

They are after my own heart. It’ll be expensive, everyone will hate them for it, and we won’t be able to waste energy willy-nilly like we do right now without it costing a LOT.

I love this party, but let’s be honest, Schreiner’s not going to be premier.

Whoever sits in the premier’s office, I wager it will be a minority. I would love to see a handful of Green Members of Provincial Parliament elected so they can start to have meaningful influence over public policy.

Terri Chu is an engineer committed to practical environmentalism. This column is dedicated to helping the community reduce energy and distinguish environmental truths from myths.

READ MORE BY TERRI CHU:

GREENINGS: Reduce, reuse, and then recycle (May 2018)

GREENINGS: Car-free parenting is not rare (Spring 2018)

GREENINGS: The science of board games (Mar. 2018)

GREENINGS: Driving fuelled by unseen subsidies (Jan. 2018)

GREENINGS: No solutions for nobody’s problem (Dec. 2017)

GREENINGS: Celebrate science not milestones (Nov. 2017)

GREENINGS: Down to the data (Oct. 2017)

GREENINGS: Reducing paper waste (Fall 2017)

GREENINGS: Taking tolls to the Gardiner and Don Valley Parkway (July 2017)

GREENINGS: Lessons from Madrid (June 2017)

GREENINGS: Thoughts on hitting the 400 benchmark (May 2017)

GREENINGS: Solving the food waste problem (April 2017)

GREENINGS: Kellie Leitch was right (March 2017)

R.S. Konjek/Gleaner News File Photo

The bats are back. The Maple Leafs are swinging once more in Dominico Field at Christie Pits, and marked the 100th anniversary of the Intercounty Baseball League with a home opening 10-6 win over the London Majors on May 6. The Leafs, which have won five games to two this season, play every Sunday and most Wednesdays. Games are free.

For more information, please visit their website at pointstreaksites.com/view/mapleleafs.

—Annemarie Brissenden/Gleaner News

Computer engineer’s love of Annex leads to gallery café

Slanted Door (422 Bloor St. W.), a new gallery café opened on Bloor Street West late last month. It’s owned by Patrick Jabbaz, who wants to promote work by emerging artists from Toronto. GEREMY BORDONARO/GLEANER NEWS

By Geremy Bordonaro

Daylight pours through the window of the café. Customers sit, sip coffee, and enjoy the splashes of remarkable colour that adorn the walls from paintings by new and emerging artists from across the city.

This is Slanted Door, the Annex’s newest café and art gallery, which is owned by Patrick Jabbaz, Silicon Valley engineer turned businessowner.

“I’ve always had a love for the arts,” said Jabbaz, adding he wanted to give back to the community he loves so much. “I was an engineer for the last 20 years, designing electronic products, so I’m not an artist myself. But a lot of artists are having a hard time making a living doing what they love. I wanted to help out, even a little bit.”

Jabbaz wanted his art gallery to stand out so he located it at 442 Bloor St. W., which is well known for the bee mural done by Nick Sweetman. The artist has also been commissioned to do several murals inside Slanted Door.

It’s part of Jabbaz’s aesthetic — preferring to highlight the work of new artists, particularly those from the neighbourhood.

“I wanted local artists,” he said. “I didn’t want famous artists. I wanted emerging artists, local, from Canada. I contacted a few artists and there was a lot of interest in showing their art in here.”

Thomas Lappano’s Still Series is currently on display in the café, originally home to The Futon Store. GEREMY BORDONARO/GLEANER NEWS

Despite Jabbaz having bought the building, there was still an issue of funding. To that he had a fairly simple but well-thought-out idea.

“Little did I know that art galleries need a lot of funding: they don’t make a lot of money. So I coupled it with a coffee shop. I wanted it to be trendy, inviting, and to have a good atmosphere.”

“The space, decor, and what we serve draws people in,” said Michele Lee, the gallery café’s manager. “We are supporting local artists and I think that’s something that people can appreciate as well.”

One such artist is Thomas Lappano, an up-and-coming artist and OCAD University graduate whose Still Series of portraits is on display.

“Patrick reached out to me by email. He had seen my website,” he said. “He asked me if I was interested in being a part of the show in the art gallery he was opening. It sounded really interesting and I was totally excited about it.”

A highlight of the gallery, Still Series captures a series of moments. Together, they form an evocative narrative from a beautiful, colourful, and modern perspective.

“With this series I wanted to explore the portrait as a narrative,” said Lappano. “I was really interested in taking snapshots of a moment, right in the middle of an action.”

Lappano is also excited to have work on display near to home.

“It’s nice to have the opportunity to show work in a public setting, in the neighbourhood I live in.”

Jabbaz himself is also no stranger to the neighbourhood.

“When I was younger I used to go to a lot of parties here. So I’m familiar with the neighbourhood,” he said, explaining that he went to Ryerson University. “I lived here for quite a while but I moved to California. I was going to be there for two years but I got married, had kids, worked so much, even moved to China for a while. I just wanted to come back here.”

While the lavish lifestyle of a jet-setting engineer may have been appealing, there was something that needed to change.

“I loved my job as an engineer but I wanted a challenge,” Jabbaz said. “I wanted to do something totally new, that I had never done before.”

And so far, there’s been a steady flow of customers at the café.

“It’s been good. It’s been nice, very steady. It is locally known for the moment,” Lee said.

Hybrid Spaces, Partly Natural and Partly Engineered (2015) by Dan Berman, from Accidental Parkland, a documentary project that showcases the city’s changing environment. Curated by Berman, this collaboration with U of T’s New College and Daniels School of Architecture, Landscape and Design is on from May 10 to 20 and includes visual exhibitions, talks, documentaries, screenings, and Beadwork by students at the First Nations School of Toronto. Accidental Parkland is part of the Scotiabank Contact Photography Festival, running this month at locations throughout Toronto. COURTESY SCOTIABANK CONTACT PHOTOGRAPHY FESTIVAL

MORE COVERS:

ON THE COVER Palm Sunday pageant (Spring 2018)

ON THE COVER: Artscape Wychwood Barns 10th anniversary (March 2018)

ON THE COVER: Wage protest (Jan. 2018)

ON THE COVER: Snowshoes and a red sweater (Dec. 2017)

ON THE COVER (Nov. 2017): Remembering

ON THE COVER (Oct. 2017): Transitory night

ON THE COVER (AUGUST 2017): Setting up for a new season

May shift to women only next year

By Geremy Bordonaro

A temporary drop-in homeless shelter at 348 Davenport Rd. is once again home to controversy. Some local residents say that there’s been a noticeable increase in violence and drugs in the area since the shelter — publicly supported by Joe Cressy (Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina) and the Annex Residents’ Association — opened in January.

“We have seen a significant increase in crime in the Davenport area compared to last year. It’s safe to say that this is due to the shelter,” said Staff Sergeant James Hogan of the Toronto Police Service’s 53 Division.

Steven Boujikian, who runs a laundromat near the shelter, said there’s been a huge increase in crime.

“There’s way more crime…way more violent crime. People shooting up on the streets. Even a few weeks ago someone walked into a local bar and died. Just on the spot…How is that acceptable?”

“Since the shelter opened,” said Cheryl Zimmer, a tenant representative at 250 Davenport Rd. who provided this photo, “we have seen an increase in people coming into our building, doing drugs in the stairs [and] hallways, and then leaving to go to the shelter.” COURTESY CHERYL ZIMMER

“Since the shelter opened,” said tenant representative Cheryl Zimmer, “we have seen an increase in people coming into our building, doing drugs in the stairs [and] hallways, and then leaving to go to the shelter.”

“This whole thing was uncalled for,” said Boujikian. “It just doesn’t fit in the area. You have all these homeless people walking around with nothing to do, causing trouble…. You can ask anyone in the area. Ask them ‘was this a bad idea?’ and they’d say ‘yes!’”

Cressy acknowledged that “respites are challenging…. They are challenging for the residents and they can also be challenging for the neighbourhood.”

However, he didn’t offer much of a solution.

“The purpose of a respite is very much that of a band-aid. It is to provide an emergency response to ensure the people have a warm place to go in the cold winter months.”

Cressy added that respites simply are not good enough to provide adequate safety for the neighbourhood and those within the building itself.

“What respites don’t have, because they’re open on an emergency basis, is that comprehensive series of supports” he said. “They don’t have all of those supportive programs to help people get out of homelessness. That’s the distinction.”

Boujikian said that the police also haven’t been very effective in addressing the increase in crime.

“The police are ignoring us,” he said. “They’re doing nothing with our complaints. Nothing to help us.”

Hogan conceded that resources have been stretched, and that it’s been difficult to respond.

“We’ve done what we can to help the community but it’s been tough.”

“The clientele that uses these respites are often homeless, dealing with addiction issues, mental health issues, and they’re hard,” Cressy said. “There’s no question that it’s hard.”

The councillor said that there needs to be a way to address homelessness in Toronto.

“It’s not enough to just do band-aids, these respites. What we need to do is create supportive housing facilities where people can transition out of homelessness,” Cressy said. “The objective here can’t just be to provide shelter. We need to have a program to end homelessness.”

The shelter closed at the end of April. It will be redeveloped into a women’s shelter with residents who will stay between three to six months. More amenities are also planned, as well as programs to help the residents find more permanent housing. This new program will be the first of a new model of shelters that Cressy says “are a stark improvement”.

—with files from Terri Chu

READ MORE:

NEWS: Shelter offers temporary respite (March 2018)